Boom Time for US Billionaires: Why the Economic Structure Perpetuates Income Disparity
To numerous US citizens, the financial landscape over the recent five-year span has been difficult. Prices have soared while salaries remains unchanged. Elevated mortgage rates have made purchasing property a dismal prospect. The rate of unemployment has been gradually increasing.
Many Americans have reported they're delaying major life decisions, including raising children or switching jobs, because of financial volatility. But for a select few of people, the recent half-decade couldn't have been more successful.
Wealth Explosion
The fortune of the world's billionaires expanded 54% in 2020, at the height of the pandemic. And even throughout all the economic instability, the stock market has only persisted in expanding. This growth has mostly helped just a small number of Americans: 10% of the population holds 93% of stock market wealth.
Despite the imbalance as this allocation seems, it's the economic framework working as it is presently configured.
"Affluent individuals have acquired their jets, they've acquired their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're securing senators and media outlets," commented economic inequality analyst Chuck Collins. "We're now moving into this other chapter of hyper-extraction where the wealthy are preying on the system of inequality."
Mapping Economic Classes
To help others understand what exactly it means to be "rich" in the US, Collins adopts a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, imagined the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Wealth Borough, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To contemporize the concept, Collins categorizes these "affluence districts" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a annual salary of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more select as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Collectively, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their lifestyles vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still traveling in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins explained. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no stakes in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system shuts down – you're set."
Extreme Affluence Consequences
The peak in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The influence that this group has substantially outweighs those who are simply well-off, let alone the typical citizen who doesn't inhabit "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the activist mantra "abolish billionaires" misses the point and has a "hint of elimination" to it.
"It's the difference between private conduct and a structure of regulations," Collins explained. "We should be concerned about an economic system that funnels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Wealth Accumulation Mechanisms
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: acquiring fortune, defending the wealth, political capture and maximum resource extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think exclusively about the first step, Collins said. People can create a limited sum of wealth through creating or operating a successful business, which could get them membership in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires substantial commitment and tactics in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their knowledge to ensure that the super rich are being strategic about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a broad range of tools such as legal entities, offshore bank accounts, secret corporations, charitable foundations and other vehicles to hold assets," he writes.
Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs political support. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and maintain expansion.
The final phase is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "maximum taking" to describe how the wealthy have come to affect nearly every single part of an Americans' everyday life largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to fund private companies.
"Private equity is searching for those sectors of the economy where they can extract value a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people understand is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is parked in so few hands, and they can kind of turn around and say, 'Where else can we generate returns out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs."
Actual Impacts
The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people spending additional funds for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the pain and frustration of this kind of society can lead to deep discontent.
"The most powerful wealthy elites understand people are being excluded [and] are monetarily hurting," Collins said, adding that conservative politicians have been good at connecting with a potent "false common-man appeal".
Political Reality
The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that government officials have appointed a succession of billionaires to government roles. Along with affluent innovators who had temporary but significant roles overseeing significant decreases to the federal workforce, other key positions for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This administrative framework, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make lasting reductions for the wealthy and corporations.
Future Solutions
While legislative bodies continue to argue that border policies and poor economic deals are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the question becomes: Will the alternative political group, which has also been influenced by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Left-leaning officials, he argues, know what policies are needed to "reverse the updraft of wealth", including deep changes to the tax system, raising the minimum wage and strengthening unions.
"It was so, so close, and the law really did embody the will of the majority of people who really want lawmakers to solve some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Elite control is not about creating so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something significant occur, but the historical precedent is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is optimistic that there can be change, but said it would require sustained political momentum.
"It may be quickly that the pendulum swings back, and then it really is about preserving a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this severe disparity we're living in," he said. "We can address this. It is solvable."