🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has joined the growing list of performers who express doubts about the essential need of on-set intimacy professionals, explaining she opted against their services while working on her new movie Die My Love.

Examining the Purpose of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

Intimacy coordinators emerged following the #MeToo era to guarantee the security and comfort of actors during sequences involving partial undress and intimate moments. However, several prominent performers including Jennifer Aniston and Sean Bean have voiced concerns about their presence, with several suggesting they interfere with artistic process.

Jennifer's On-Set Perspective

Speaking during the Las Culturistas podcast, while discussing her new film where she portrays a woman descending into postpartum disturbance, the actress stated: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or maybe we had the option but didn't make use of their services... I felt completely safe with Rob."

She continued: "He is not pervy and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations primarily focused on family life and personal connections. There was absolutely no uncomfortable moments or questions about professional limits."

"Had there been the slightest indication of discomfort, I definitely would have requested an intimacy coordinator. Many male actors take offense if you aren't interested in their attention, and then the retaliation starts. He was completely different."

Professional Validation and Continuing Discussion

Recently, entertainment database IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, alongside multiple additional professional roles including choreography, craft services, and puppetry. Previously, they were grouped under "additional crew" instead of having their specific credit.

Despite this recognition, these professionals continue to face public discussion suggesting they might not be industry essential, with high-profile actors declining their participation. Lawrence's perspective echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier shared she refused intimacy coordination while working with Jon Hamm on The Morning Show.

Jennifer's Perspective

"He proved to be extremely respectful – truly every move, between takes, 'Are you OK?" she recalled. "It was additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, appropriate music. So, minimal preparation is needed."

She added, "Production suggested, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Please, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're seasoned actors – we can handle this. And we had Mimi on set."

Other Examples and Professional Response

Despite featuring numerous scenes of sexual activity and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's acclaimed film about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – proceeded without an on-set professional.

The film's star explained she and co-star her screen partner "decided it would be best to maintain privacy."

"The role I play is a sex worker, and I had researched Sean's films and recognized his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I approached it as professional work."

These statements provoked significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, mirroring the response to another actress's public statements, who recently revealed that filming her new movie her latest film represented her initial experience with the relatively new profession, which she "was unaware of previously."

Paltrow's Perspective

During filming about comfort level with a particular action alongside co-star Timothée Chalamet, the actress responded: "I'm from the generation where you remove clothing, you assume position, the camera's on."

She continued that she and Chalamet then informed the coordinator: "We believe we're good. You can maintain distance.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that."

Professional Reaction

Following these comments, industry executive an experienced producer labeled them "concerning" and pointed out that most of those opposing these professionals possess sufficient fame to command their own power and security on film sets.

"Periodically an actor makes comments about whether they appreciate on-set professionals or not," said Hollick. "Gwyneth Paltrow stated she grew up in a time when industry professionals 'took our kit off and proceeded professionally'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood performing alongside a man much younger than her, while I'm sure he is chill, I considered it quite an irresponsible statement."

Male Perspective

Michael Douglas, meanwhile, shared that he feels the main obligation during intimate sequences rests with the male actor, rather than a external professional.

"In my experience, you assume duty as the man to make certain the female co-star is comfortable, you discuss it thoroughly," he explained. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's agreeable'. It's very deliberate but appears like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what authentic performance looks like."